M. Sydney:December 2000
Hillary Rodham Clintonís story is that of an intelligent, talented, ambitious, and
determined woman who had decent and powerful ideals. She had many opportunities
through which she could have implemented those ideals and had she remained focused on
such, she would have been a valuable and respected asset to society. However, forces
stronger than herself prevented her from choosing that path, thereby leaving her to take a
path that was destructive to her political goals, although beneficial to the aspiration of
others. This behavior left many people to ponder the question, ìwhy did this ìintelligent,
talented, and ambitiousî woman succumb to those forces rather than apply herself to her
own aspirations, and more importantly, will she have the courage to overpower those
forces in the future in order to address her own aspirations?î
As a young woman, Hillary Rodham Clinton had decent and powerful ideals and the
tools with which to implement those ideals. Hillary Clinton believed that one day she was
going to differentiate herself from her colleagues by practicing government differently
than they had in the past. However, it wasnít until mid-January1996 while writing the
book It Takes a Village, that Hillary eloquently and with conviction delineated her
concept ofÝ ìprevention.î She stated that ìpreventionî could be carried out through the
intervention of government, meaning that ìgovernment is an instrument both to promote
the common good and to protect an individualís rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happinessî(305). She suggested the necessity for government to become involved with
nearly all of our lives beginning at birth, indicating that the most crucial and precious
years in oneís life are those lived during the first three years and if those years should be
poorly managed the negative effects will be life-long. Therefore, in order to insure that
the people of our future are decent and productive, the government should step in and
provide assistance to the many parents that are incapable of providing one thing or
another for one reason or another, thereby creating a village for the children on which
they can depend. Those powerful ideas led to a Number One bestseller, however, a
Number One bestseller was not enough for her, as she never vocally expressed those
ideas.
During Hillaryís adult life she had always placed herself in the political arena, which, of
course, is ideal in terms of acting on behalf of the people in our ìvillagesî. Hillary
majored in political science and graduated at the top of her class, and immediately
thereafter, obtained a law degree from Yale. She had the knowledge with which
to champion to make important differences. As stated by one of Hillaryís professors,
Alan Schecter, ìshe was able to take a liberal program and analyze it pragmatically to
determine whether it workedÖShe has the intellectual ability, personality, and character
to make a remarkable contribution to American societyî(Sheeny 67). Furthermore, she
had great focus, determination, and courage and was always tenacious in executing her
scholastic goals. Why then, during her political career, political writer by the name of
Peggy Noonan asks, ìdidnít she create one program, pass one bill, or lower one tax?î (95).
In an attempt to understand why Hillary has accomplished so little in terms of addressing
her own goals, one must try to understand, or at the very least, theorize, the psychology
behind Hillary Rodham Clintonís modus operandi when trying to provide explanations
for her behavior. Hillary was raised as a child by a militant father and a mother who
was determined to push her daughter to distinguish herself in life ñ believing this was the
way a woman should live her life, a way in which she herself was unable to live. Hillary
often cited her father Hugh Rodham as the source of her drive to succeed, which may be
true, but he was also the source that left her accomplishments unsung. He was extremely
demanding of Hillary and was always raising the barometer for better performance. In
The Seduction of Hillary Clinton, written by David Brock, Hillary retells a story, ìno
matter how hard she tried to please her father with good grades and extracurricular
achievements, it never seemed to be enough. On being shown one of Hillaryís straight-A
reports cards, Hugh once remarked, ìYou must have gone to an easy schoolî(3). Sending
pejorative messages to his daughter insinuating she was never quite adequate for his
liking, would only further fuel her drive to gain his praise. Thereafter Hillary would
continually bend over backwards in additional attempts, however, her efforts failed as she
never quite reached his barometer.
While studying law at Yale in 1971, Hillary met a man that was capable of expressing
all that her father had not been able to express; approval, respect, appreciation, and
admiration. This man was Bill Clinton. This was a pivotal turning point in Hillaryís life.
Bill immediately began to fill Hillaryís dark inner-void. ìAs Hillary likely saw it, Bill
was someone who would listen to a womanís view, treat her as an equal, and share her
political idealsî(Brock 40). She had found someone with whom she could share her
dreams and probably thought that the two of them together could accomplish great things.
Unlike Hillary, Bill was very gregarious and had the ability to connect with people and
effectively break any barriers with his style of a warm demeanor and sense of humor. His
personality combined with her high IQ and passion to endlessly research issues, made for
a perfect synergy. They truly complemented one another. However, Billís exceeding
warmth towards people would later prove to be a detriment equal to its being an attribute,
as he, along with Hillary, also had unresolved issues stemming from childhood, which
would inevitably interfere with his relationships with women. Hillary found herself in
another challenging and self-damaging relationship. Billís need for attention and power
would have Hillary forever struggling to keep his attention, thus incorporating into
Hillaryís life a new barometer, one which would replace her fatherís.
Many people ask why someone would allow herself to fall into a self-destructive
situation, one as equally disappointing to the one she had known all of her life. One
explanation could be that, perhaps, it was something comparable to an addiction and
without treatment only continues and often worsens. After time, this addiction became a
combination of Hillaryís need to gain Billís affection along with her feelings of
resentment and anger towards all of his humiliating and insensitive acts, of which
stemmed from his own sexual needs, which ultimately became the fuel for her addiction.
But all the anger in the world could not satiate her addiction. Therefore, the only
alternative route for Hillary was to fictitiously rise above the addiction by harnessing
those feelings and utilizing them. She had finally reached a point in her life where she
had gained a new strength and felt it was time to play catch-up. She believed it
was time to muster up all of her anger and utilize it. She needed to show the country that
she would not be remembered as playing the role of the good First Lady, one who sat
looking adoringly at her husband while all the while he had embarrassed her before the
entire country with his philandering behavior. It was time to reverse the role-playing
between Hillary and Bill, however in a narcissistic manner only. Along with maintaining
the continuum of her addiction, she would place herself alone in the spotlight, if only for
a moment, in an attempt to erase memories of herself standing in his shadow.
During Hillaryís last two years serving as First Lady, she made a great effort towards
establishing herself in the public eye in a more positive light than that with which she had
been perceived during the initial six years of her tenure. Doing this was necessary for two
reasons.Ý Firstly, perhaps she envisioned herself with an opportunity which would allow
her to implement some of her grand ideals. Secondly, she understood that in order to keep
Bill close by her side after he finished his presidential term, she must keep him busy in
some manner or another. Therefore, whether it was placing him back into the spotlight or
keeping him actively involved in political arena, she knew she needed to construct a plan,
hence, her move towards the U.S. Senate campaign trail.
In understanding the challenging task ahead of her, Hillary strategically created a
blueprint which would be built on a foolproof foundation. Initially, she would rely
heavily on what she has come to symbolize for so many people. As, political writer,
Peggy Noonan, describes it:
Hillary Clinton really is, as they say, one of those striking modern media
figures to whom people seem toÖbring themselves. They bring aspects
and dramas onto her. She comes to symbolize things for people, as if
she stands for certain facts in their lives. Part of the reason for this is our
therapeutic culture, which encourages such projections; part of it is due to
the nature of modern fameóthose who are famous now are not just famous, theyíre the wallpaper, all around us, on every news show, in every face. But part of the reason for Hillaryís iconic power is that she and her husband have lived a public life of outsized personal drama marked by mysteries and betrayals and bitterness and accusations. Thereís something for almost everyone. Women who have been abused and humiliated by a man are said to see her as a fellow survivor; her victory is their redemption. Feminists see her as a woman operating in the world against the odds; her triumph is theirs. (They also see in her their own political assumptions; she will carry their program forward.) Some middle-
aged boomers see in her the last rise of the ethos of the sixties, the ethos of their youth; if she succeeds it means their era, and theirÝ investment in it, had meaning.(xviii)
Additionally, she would campaign hard and make any necessary adjustments needed in
order to win; she would manipulate, or shall we say, adjust her image in every aspect; she
would strategically out-play her opponent and would easily overcome the ìcarpetbaggerî
issue, however, she would not yet incorporate her true ideals.
To some degree, one has to appreciate the amount of effort Hillary placed on reshaping
her image, because not all people are capable of nearly loosing oneís own physical
identity for such pursuits. Although, itís unlikely that Hillary viewed her gradual
appearance alteration as such. Hillary spent her last twenty years observing the methods
behind her husband Billís success, Hillary learned that it was necessary to be physically
appealing as well as intellectually appealing: Therefore, she began to alter her appearance
in order to look more affable for the public. During the eighties, Peggy Noonan,
remembers when Hillary had brown hair to her shoulders and glasses and wore a shawl.Ý
She looked up at people when she spoke to them because in those days she wasnít tallÖî
The point is not that she had changed, people do; or that sheís always trying to look
better, people do that, too. The point is that she changes so much and so often not only in
her look but in the image she is trying to project. The constant parade of new looks
reflects and endless attempt to craft a new persona, with new ways to market herself as a
commodityî (15).Ý
When considering how often Hillary presented herself to various audiences twenty years
later, one must be overwhelmed by the thought of how often she had to reconstruct her
appearance. One look for the ìhipî New Yorkers, another look for the Harlem Baptists,
another for the Puerto Rican parade, another for the conservative upstate New Yorkers,
and the list goes on (good thing she had an endless stream of fashion consultants at her
disposal).Ý Hillary went to great lengths to assimilate into each group. She catered to her
audience with an image to which they connected, and did so effectively and to such a
degree that she became something comparable to a celebrity with many award winning
images, however, differing in terms of the awards won through great accomplishments.
In addition to altering her image, Hillary focused on another step towards victory, which
was debating her opponent, Rick Lazio. She was prepared to play hardball. Hillary had
never run an election of her own, but needless to say, had much experience in the world
of campaigning, as opposed to Rick Lazio who was still in the little leagues. He had
never branched out beyond a state level nor engaged in politics with the so-called ìheavy
hittersî. His naivetÈ in the realm of politics was proven when it was time to debate
Hillary. In addition, Hillary had to be very cautious in her approach when delicately
stepping on her opponent, as the media would certainly view Hillary as either too
aggressive, manipulative and brash or just a plain dirty campaigner. Her tactics in this
campaign had to be strategically planned in order to be effective, and the plan did not
include her ideals of ìpreventionî as her plan was built to win a Senate race and not for
expressing oneís greatest platform.
An example of her tactics, although not proven to be such, occurred about midway
through the campaign trail, when Hillary set a trap for Rick Lazio, into which he fell
blindly. Lazio insisted that soft-dollars be banned for the use of all New York State
Campaign races. Just days after Hillary and Rick agreed to ban the use of soft-dollars ñ
he breaks the rules by accepting soft-dollar contributions! Itís an interesting coincidence
that the timing of this mutually agreed ban on soft-dollars took place shortly before
Lazioís previously arranged fund-raisers. These fund-raisers could not be cancelled and
which inevitably raised soft-dollars that were going to exceed the limit of dollars allowed
per person. Coincidently, Hillary had already raised all of the necessary funds for her
campaign by that point. Had Lazio had more experience in the realm of campaigning, he
would have anticipated these tactics, rather than focusing tirelessly on ìwhat it means to
be a New Yorkerî, which later only proved to enhance Hillaryís situation more than his
own.Ý
While Hillary debated Lazio on the campaign trail, she focused aggressively on the
ìcarpetbaggerî issue. In an effort to persuade voters in this decision-making process, it is
expected that the candidate ìrunningî have knowledge of current issues that concern
people within a given state and demonstrate leadership skills in order to address possible
future situations such as ìdeclaring war, maintaining the armed forces, assessing taxes,
borrowing money, minting currency, regulating commerce, and making all laws
necessary for the operation of the government,î as delineated on the US Senate website.
Additionally, although not a prerequisite, having established ìrootsî within the state for
which he or she is running has always been the norm, as it creates a level of comfort for
the voters, assuring them that the candidate has a historical and emotional tie to their
home state and will act genuinely on its behalf.Ý Hillary Clinton did not demonstrate what
is typically the norm in a political campaign, as she used the ìcarpetbaggerî rhetoric to
her advantage. She quickly and successfully ascertained that oneís history of residency
within the state where one is campaigning is an issue of little importance to many people
--at least in New York City.Ý In so many words, Hillary stated that New York has always
been for her and to others, the entrance to the land of opportunity, which means that the
gates to New York City are open to everyone and that included her. Itís hard to disagree
with this, as many people -- including myself -- have arrived in New York seeking to
discover its many facets. New York consists of an extraordinary multinational race;
According to the U.S. Bureau of Census, the population in the state of New York is
18,196,601, which is consists of approximately 14,368,601 eligible to vote. Of this total
count, fifty-two percent are women and 25% are non-whites. Additionally, more than half
the eligible voters reside in Manhattan along with the five surrounding boroughs. New
York City is incredibly diverse in terms of its culture, race and gender, making it the
perfect ground for a ìcarpetbaggerî to campaign, which is precisely why she chose New
York.
Hillary was aware that an important step towards winning the U.S. Senate seat was to
address the peopleís concerns within New York state. In doing so, Hillary simply
reiterated some of the same ideological statements taken from her college
commencement speech given in 1969. ìPart of the problem with empathy with professed
goals is that empathy doesnít do us anything. Weíve had lots of empathy, weíve had lots
of sympathy, but we feel that for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of the
possible. And the challenge now is to practice politics as the art of making what appears
to be the impossibleÖî(Torrecelli 282). Many years after she had given that speech, she
had yet to demonstrate much of what she had so eloquently expressed. With regard to
implementing government as a measurement of ìpreventionî, I, along with everyone else,
never had a chance to be for, against or impartial to her ideal, as it wasnít presented to us.
Running for the U.S. Senate seat would have been a great opportunity for her to voice her
true convictions, however in doing so she may have risked too many votes. Therefore,
it left her to champion the many nebulous issues such as introducing uniforms in public
schools, ending teen smoking, revitalizing local libraries and increasing entrepreneurship.
ìYou talk about stuff you canít do anything about, but that people like,î said Maurice
Carroll. ìItís a great trick.î Unfortunately. the spotlight and the power proved to be
more important to her than the issues she discusses so passionately
about in her book It
Takes a Village. Richard Nixon once observed that ìonly two kinds of people run for
office in America; those who want to do big things and those who want to be big peopleî
(Noonan 11). The latter seems to be the apparent choice in Hillaryís case, although while
running for Senate she managed to navigate the campaign in such a way that the people
chose to believe otherwise.
Projecting forward to 2001 when Hillary successfully attains the New York Senate
Seat; Iím inclined to believe that she will immediately try to find one issue that concerns
New Yorkers in hopes that she can provide an immediate remedy, thereby having one
achievement under her belt in the eyes of New Yorkers. Thereafter she will place her
attention on establishing popularity in states other than New York.Ý She has already won
New York, therefore she must simply pacify this group by abiding by the political rules
and etiquette of oneís home state. One must remember that as Senator, Hillary will be
working on particular committees along with other Senators, which are designed to focus
their efforts on a national level as opposed to a state level. Therefore, New Yorkers will
be tolerant knowing that sheíll be representing not only New York, but the nation as a
whole. Therefore, this seat will provide her with unlimited possibilities in terms of
marketing herself.
When the moment arrives when Hillary is perceived as being responsible for
accomplishing one good deed for the State of New York, she will, I imagine, then focus
most of her attention on every other state.Ý She will place high priorities on those states
that present high college electoral votes, because if she decides to run for the presidency,
these states will be especially important ñ unless of course, electoral votes no longer still
exist, as Hillary will be working on measures to eliminate what she considers to be an
archaic part of the constitution.Ý Hillary will also work diligently to raise the public
opinion stats.Ý During her first tenure as First Lady, a popularity public opinion poll was
taken which reflectedÝ ìA near majority (forty-seven percent) Gallup Poll recognized
Hillary Rodham Clinton as being qualified to be President someday and over one third
(36%) said they personally would like to see her run for Presidentî(Burrell117).
However, after a bit of turbulence with regard to her involvement in unscrupulous affairs,
these numbers dropped.Ý If she positions herself appropriately during her Senate tenure,
she will have the opportunity to regain those high opinions as well as improve upon them.
Furthermore, her future may depend on raising the public opinion polls; after Bill loses
the initial enthrallment of Hillaryís Senate victory and after a few years have passed,
circumstances in the Clinton household will most likely appear a bit sedentary for the
likes of two individuals who typically thrive on more attention -- especially in Billís case.
In an effort to refuel and/or appease Billís need to be the center of attention, Hillary will
need to take steps in order to create stimulation, because if she does not he certainly will.
Therefore that will be time for Hillary to focus on the Presidential election. She will
request the assistance of her husband, as she needs him to apply himself to something in
order for his restlessness to subside.Ý If they should win the presidency, this will once
again place him on the national stage, albeit as First Man, nevertheless, he would be in
his element and work and adapt well to his new situation ñ at least for a while. But then
what next?Ý Perhaps a second term, but I donít think that will suffice ñ something drastic
must occur; the question is who will make this occur, Hillary or Bill? I can only hope that
Hillary is the initiator in making something drastic happen; sheís done it before, perhaps
this time it will be something productive and positive.
Ý
Hillary clearly still has the opportunity to place her herself back on the right path; Hillary
needs to come forward in a way that is much more reflective of her true goals. She
continues to obtain the necessary tools, with which she can implement her ideals,
therefore, she needs only to remove her book It takes a Village from the bookshelf and
clarify her stance vocally. She needs to have the discipline to take small steps toward her
idea of ìpreventionî as opposed to the giant steps she has generally taken towards
matters, which in the past have only proven to fail. It is time for Hillary to begin creating
solutions for some of the problems in society, instead of creating a ìfixî for an addiction.
And, perhaps, in time, if Hillary can overcome the powerful forces of her emotional
addiction, she will find that applying herself productively for the sake of our country is
more gratifying than for the sake of fulfilling a destructive void. Therefore, when and if
she begins to believe in herself and has the courage to stand behind her ideals with
conviction, then and only then, will she be capable of applying herself and her tools to the
her own aspirations.
Bibliography
Aldrich,
Gary. Unlimited Access. An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House Washington
D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc. 1996
Archibold,
Randal C. The 2000 Campaign. U.S. Senate. "With the Soft-Money Issue,
Lazio becomes a player." New York Times 24 Sept. 2000
Balz, Dan: Giuliani Set His Site on the First Lady The New York Post
30 March 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nyp3_30_2.html>
Barry, Dan: Message to HillaryNo.com is Yes to Giuliani The New York Times
30 March 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nyt3_30.html>
Berke, Richard L.: A Clinton Candidacy Divides Democrats The New York Times
27 May 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews5_27nyt.html>
Birnbaum, Gregg: Hillary's N.Y. Trip a Case of Exploratory 'Urgery' New York Post
2 June 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews7_6.html>
Birnbaum, Gregg " Rudy's Pollster Helps Rick Talk a Good Game " New York Post
13 Oct 2000
Brock,
David. The Seduction of Hillary Rodham New York: Simon & Schuster 1996
Bumiller,
Elisabeth. First Lady Emerges From Shadow and Begins to Cast Her Own: The
New York Times 9 Nov 2000
Burrell,
Barbera. Public Opinion, The First Ladyship, and Hillary Rodham Clinton New
York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc. 1997
Carroll, Maurice: Quinnipiac College Poll Quinnipiac College Polling Institute
15 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/qpoll4_15.html>
Ý
Clinton,
Hillary. Personal Interview. 11 Oct 2000
Clinton, Hillary " Health Insurance for Every New York Child. " Child Health Plus.
New York 10 Apr.2000
Clinton, Hillary " Strengthening and Supporting Our Families. " City of Albany,
New York 10 Feb.2000
Clinton, Hillary " Restoring Trust Within Our Communities. " Church. New York.
20 March 2000
Clinton, Hillary " Building Communities Free of Crime and Full of Respect. " Church. New York 5 March 2000
Clinton, Hillary " Keeping Long Island on
the Forefront of Technology. " Long Island. New York 14 April 2000
Clinton,
Hillary. Literature provided and paid for by U.S. Senate Committee, Inc
Dye,
Thomas R. Who's Running America? The Clinton Years New Jersey: Prentice Hall
1995
Fournier, Ron: Mrs. Clinton Makes Campaign-Like Swing; Ickes Gets Staff Commitments Associated Press 19 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/ap4_19.html>
Getlin, Josh: First Lady Play Coy as She Explores N.Y. Senate Race Associated Press
21 April, 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/latimes4_21.html>
Haberman,
Maggie. Capitol Hill vs. King of the Hill: New York PostÝÝ ÝÝ9
Nov 2000
Haberman, Maggie " Hill Booed Roundly At Israel Rally " New York Post 13 Oct 2000
Zogby, John: Hillary Leads Lazio by 4; Gore Maintains
Huge N.Y. Lead Over Bush Zogby International 2 Oct 2000 <http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=285>
Hardt,
Robert. How Hill Survived Hell: New York Post 9 Nov 2000
Hardt Jr., Robert: N.Y. Run May Mean Hillary Heartbreak NY Post
20 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nypost4_20.html>
Hardt Jr., Robert: Rudy's Site Gives Hill Short End of the Stick The New York Post
30 March 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nyp3_30.html>
Hibbs, Gerald L. Lazio Rises to the Challenge. 22 May 2000 <wysiwyg://65/http:www.newssynthesis.com/columns/052200.html>.
Hibbs,Gerald L. Hillary Way Behind in New York. 15 Dec.1999
<wysiwyg://51/http://www.newssynthesis.com/columns/121599.html>.
Hicks, Jonathon P. " Lazio and Mrs. Clinton
Trade Charges Upstate. " New York Times on the Web 17 Oct.2000
<http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/17/nyregion/17NYSEN.html>.
Hillary Clinton 2000- anti Hillary Clinton opinions
18 Oct 2000 <http://hillary2000.com/opinions.html>
Hirschkorn, Phil " Clinton Gets Environmentalist Support, Explains Fund-Raising
Mix-up" 13 Oct 2000 <http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/10/13/hrcny.cnn/index.html>
Humbert, Marc: State Party Leader Says Mrs. Clinton Plans Exploratory Committee Associated Press 27 May 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews5_27ap.html>
Humbert, Marc: Top New York Dem Says He's Convinced Hillary Is Running
Associated Press 21 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/ap4_21.html>
Humbert, Marc: New York's Guessing Game: Will She? Will He? Associated Press
26 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/ap4_26.html>
Lambro, Donald: Andrew Cuomo Expects Hillary to Run For Senate Washington Times
9 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/washtimes4_9.html>
Lipton, Eric "Mrs. Clinton Visits Harlem as Lazio Courts Upstate Vote"
16 Oct 2000 <http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/16/nyregion/16NY-SENA.htm>
ÝLombardi, Frank: Hil Tells Why She's Eyeing a Run for Senate NY Daily News
20 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nydailynews4_20.html>
Milton,
Joyce. The First Partner. Hillary Rodham Clinton New York: William marrow
and Company, Inc. 1999
McIntyre, JohnÝ " NY Senate Debate Scoreboard " 9 Oct 2000
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-10_05_00_JM_NY.htm>
Murphy, Dean E. " Mrs. Clinton is riding the
Trend, Polls. "Ý New York Times
on the Web 30 Sep.2000 <http://www.NYTimes.com/2000/09/30/politics/30poll.html>.
Murray,
Shailagh. New York Wins Extends Bill Clintonís Influence: The Wall Street
Journal Nov. 8, 2000
Nagourney, Adam: Mrs. Clinton Starts Interviewing Political Help for a Possible Campaign New York Times 2 June 1999
<http://hillaryno.com/dailynews6_2nyt.html>
Nagourney, Adam: Hillary Clinton Begins Non-Campaign Swing NY Times
20 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nytimes4_20.html>
New York Senate Debate
political correspondent Marcia Kramer. WCBS-TV New YorkÝÝÝ 8 Oct.2000
Noonan, Peggy. The Case Against Hillary Clinton
New York:ReganBooks
Noonan, Peggy.Ý " Act II: It's Mrs. Clinton's Show " 9 Oct 2000
<http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=6500039>
Orin, Deborah: Pals: Hill's 'Definitely Running' New York Post 2 June 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews6_2.html>
Peyser, Andrea " Hill's History Lesson Has No Basis in Truth " New York Post
13 Oct 2000
Port, Bob " Big Names, Big Bucks " The New York Daily News 22 Sept 2000
Rodham
Clinton, Hillary. It takes a village. And Other Lessons Children Teach Us
New York: Simon & Schuster 1996
Seifman, David: Hillary's N.Y. Stump Stint Keeps the Party Going New York Post
1 May 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/nyposy5_1.html>
Serafin, Kim " Hillary Clinton's So- Called
Town Meeting " 26 Apr 2000 <http://www.rudyyes.com/contents/news/4-26-00release.htm>
Sheeny,
Gail. Hillary's Choice New York: Random House 1999
Siegel, Joel: Dems Say Hil's Gonna Go for It New York Daily News 27 May 1999Ý <http://hillaryno.com/dailynewa5_27dn.html>
Siegal, Joel: Pals Say Hil's Eager to Enter Senate Race Daily News 1 May 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews5_1.html>
Taylor Fleming, Anne : Hillary Clinton: The Good, The Bad and The Painful. Essay.
16 Oct.2000. <http://www.womenwire.com/affairs/hillary.html>
Torricelli,
Senator Robert. In Our Own Words. Extraordinary Speeches of American Century
New York: Washington Square Press 2000
Towery,
Matt. Mean Business. The Insider's Guide to Winning any Political Election
Georgia: Longstreet Press 2000
U.S.
Bureau of Census State and County Quickfacts. New York <http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36000.html>
U.S.
Senate Committee, Inc Handouts
United States Senate. Learning about the Senate. How the Senate works. Ý<http://www.senate.gov/learning/index.cfm>
Van Dongen, Rachel: Hillary Clinton Gets Ready for N.Y. Swing Roll Call
12 April 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/rollcall4_12.html>
Van Natta Jr., Don: First Lady Said to Inch Closer to Senate Bid The New York Times
20 May 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews5_20nyt.html>
Walsh, Joan: Off and Running?- Hillary Clinton Moves to Hire a New York Campaign Staff Salon.com <http://hillaryno.com/salon4_16.html>
Weiss, Juleanna G. " Do the Math, Mrs. Clinton." 15 Apr 2000 <http://www.rudyyes.com/contents/news/4-15-00release.htm>
Zogby, John: Wrong Time, Wrong State New York Times 2 June 1999 <http://hillaryno.com/dailynews6_2oped.html>