Slides / Bullets
- Mixed quantifiers
- The order of quantifiers makes a difference:
- ∀x∃y(Hates(x,y)) vs ∃x∀y(Hates(x,y))
- ∀x∃y(SameCol(x,y)) vs ∃x∀y(SameCol(x,y))
- The step-by-step method of translation
- This is very useful for sentences that contain several quantified noun phrases.
- EG: ‘Every dog lives in some kennel’
- Step one: ∀x(Dog(x) → lives-in-some-kennel(x))
- Step two: ∀x(Dog(x) → ∃y(Kennel(y) ∧ LivesIn(x,y))
-
- EG: ‘Every dog who lives in a kennel has an owner who lives in a house’.
- Step One: ∀x(Dog(x)∧lives-in-a-kennel(x) → has-an-owner-who-lives-in-a-house(x)).
- Step Two: ∀x(Dog(x)∧∃y(Kennel(y) ∧ LivesIn(x,y)) → ∃z(Owns(x,z) ∧ lives-in-a-house(z)).
- Step Three: ∀x(Dog(x)∧∃y(Kennel(y) ∧ LivesIn(x,y)) → ∃z(Owns(x,z) ∧ ∃y(House(y) ∧ LivesIn(z,y))).
- Ambiguity
- Quantifiers in English are a rich source of ambiguity.
- ‘Some poor sucker is mugged every minute’.
- ? ∃x(Poor(x)∧Sucker(x)∧mugged-every-minute(x))
- ∀x(Minute(x)→some-poor-sucker-is-mugged-during(x))
- Often this ambiguity is resolved by context.