Molecular Ecology, In Press, all rights reserved

 

Title:  Nucleotide Diversity in Populations of Balitorid Cave Fishes from Thailand

 

Authors:  Richard L. Borowsky1 and         Chavalit Vidthayanon2

 

Addresses:  1) Cave Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, New York University, Washington Square, NY 10003, USA. 2)  Aquatic Natural Resources Museum,  Department of Fisheries, Keset-Klang, Phaholyothin Road, Jatujak, Bangkok  10900, Thailand.

 

Date of Receipt:

 

Keywords:  Nucleotide Diversity, Troglobitic Fishes, Balitoridae, RAPD

Running Head:  Nucleotide diversity in fishes

 

Correspondence: Richard L. Borowsky, Cave Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, New York University, Washington Square, NY 10003, USA.  FAX (212) 995-4015, rb4@scires.nyu.edu


Abstract

Genetic variabilities in four cave and eight surface species of balitorid freshwater fishes from Thailand were assessed using RAPDs.  The cave species have consistently lower RAPD variation than the surface species and it is hypothesized that this difference is a function of reduced population size in cave fishes.  Indices of nucleotide diversity (p) were calculated from the RAPD data and are four to five times higher for the surface species than the cave species:  6.4 * 10-3   vs. 1.4 * 10-3.  The p values for cave fishes are significantly lower than those of the surface balitorids and those measured in other species using RAPD/AFLP data.


Introduction

Obligatorily cave dwelling (troglobitic) fishes warrant attention because so many of their populations are threatened.  Of the 85 currently recognized cave fish species, five are listed as "Endangered" or "Critically Endangered" and 46 as "Vulnerable," on the UICN Red Lists (Proudlove, 1997; Weber et al. 1998).  Their proportionate representation on the Red Lists exceeds that of almost any other animal group.

            Because of the limited accessibility and occult nature of their habitat, relatively little is known about the population attributes of troglobitic fishes.  Data on effective population sizes and relative genetic variability, for example, are sparse, although they are of particular importance in assessment and management of threatened populations.  The few data available suggest troglobitic fish populations have low genetic variability and are relatively small in size.      Poulson (1963) sampled ten populations of three species of troglobitic amblyopsids, and estimated their numbers to range on the orders of 101 to 102.   Mitchell et al. (1977) estimated the size of the Pachon Cave population of blind Mexican Tetras (Astyanax mexicanus) at between 103 and 104 individuals from mark-recapture data.   Trajano (1997) used mark-recapture to estimate the population size of a trichomycterid cave catfish in Minas Gerais, Brazil at 103.  Local population sizes clearly vary among species, but appear to range on the orders of 102 to 103.

            Only three studies have directly compared genetic variability in troglobitic and related epigean fish species (Avise and Selander, 1972; Swofford, et al., 1980; Perez and Moodie, 1993).  Each assessed genetic variability by enzyme electrophoresis, and showed the troglobites to have lower heterozygosities than the comparison surface species: on average, H = 0.01 vs. 0.06 (Table 1).  The number of animals used in these studies varied from scores to hundreds.  Thus, the study methodology placed a non-negligible cost on the studied population.

            Here, we sought to test the generality of the observation that cave fish populations have relatively low genetic variability, and do so in a way that used a minimal number of animals.  We did this by sampling a small number of individuals at a large number of loci.  This strategy compensates for the increased sampling variance from the small number of individuals by averaging over the many loci.  Nei (1978) has theorized that reliable estimates of genetic heterozygosity can be obtained with sample sizes as small as two individuals.

            With small sample sizes it is essential that sampling be unbiased and representative; this approach should be applied cautiously if there is any evidence of non-random distributions of related individuals.  We feel this is unlikely in the present case because the hypogean fishes sampled were sparsely distributed and taken from different areas within the caves and the epigean fishes were selected at random from larger numbers of fishes collected from different parts of the stream.

            We looked at phenotypic variability of RAPD bands, which are anonymous markers amplified out of genomic DNA using single or paired primers at low stringency (Welsh and McClelland, 1990; Williams et al. 1990).  An advantage of RAPDs in a study of this type is that large numbers of loci can be screened with minimal effort.  We examined over 1000 markers in each population, using sample sizes of two or four individuals.  We estimated nucleotide diversity (p) from the RAPD data using a simple relationship between band sharing probability and p (Borowsky, 2001).


Materials and Methods

 

Balitorid fishes

Twelve (or thirteen, see below) species were studied, of which four are troglobites:  Cryptotora thamicola, Nemacheilus troglocataractus, Schistura oedipus, and a new cave fish species from Phitsanulok, S. aff. reidi.  The first species belongs in the subfamily balitorinae while the other three species belong to the nemacheilinae.

            At present, there is no phylogenetic hypothesis for the balitorids of Southeast Asia that would permit identification of sister taxa to the studied cave species.  To gain generality in the comparison group, eight epigean species representing both subfamilies were chosen for contrast.   These included six nemacheilines (S. reidi, S. poculi, S. paucicinta, S. maepaiensis, N. pallidus, and Acanthocobitis zonalternans), and two balitorines (Balitora burmanica, and Homaloptera smithi).  A single population of each species was studied, except for S. poculi and H. smithi.  These are probably the two most widely distributed balitorid species in Southeast Asia (Kottelat, 1989) and we were interested in the consistency of variation among populations.  We studied five populations of H. smithi, three from Phang Nga province on the Malaysian peninsula and two from the mainland, and two of S. poculi.  As discussed below, the five populations of “H. smithi” probably represent two distinct taxa.  Locality data are given in the Figure captions.  All species names are sensu Kottelat (1989, 1990, or 1998). 

 


RAPD techniques

RAPD bands were amplified using published techniques (Borowsky et al. 1995) modified as follows: amplifications were done using Stoffel Taq polymerase (PE Cetus) and pairs of short primers (10 and 11 mers), rather than AmpliTaq and long single primers.  Ten microliter reactions were cycled as follows: (94° for 3min); 40 cycles (94° for 1 min, 35° for 1 min, 72° for 2 min); 72° for 7 min.   Products were labeled by the incorporation of 33P, separated on 0.4 mm, 4% polyacrylamide sequencing gels under denaturing conditions (50% Urea), and visualized by autoradiography.

            The nine primers we used were: OPN24 (5'AGGGGCACCA3'), OPN28 (GCACCAGGGG), US6 (GTGGTGACAG), US12 (ACAGACAGTG), N1+ (ACGAAGAAGAG), N2+ (AAGAAGAGCAA), KA1+ (GAGGGTGCCTT), KA2+ (GGTGCCTTTGG) and KB1- (TCTGGCTTGAA).  These were used in the following ten pairings: OPN24 with N1+ or N2+ or KA1+ or KA2+; OPN28 with US6 or US12 or KA1+ or KB1-; US6 with N1+ or N2+.

 

Statistics

The average number of bands scored per primer combination in each population ranged from 68 to 127 (mean = 104 + 17.5).  We scored ten different primer sets and obtained over 1000 bands per population.  Pairs of individuals from the same populations were run in adjacent lanes, and we counted the numbers of shared and unique bands for each pair.  The proportion of unmatched RAPD bands between pairs of individuals randomly chosen from the population is our basic measure of diversity.  This proportion is denoted fe, the Phenotypic Heterogeneity Index.  In each population, fe was determined separately for each primer combination.  These separate estimates were then averaged to obtain an overall population estimate of fe and its standard error.  Of the seventeen populations we studied, eleven were represented by two individuals and six others by four.  These six populations allowed us independent replicate estimates of f, in order to assess its consistency.  Because f is a linear function of p, at least in the biologically realistic range of values (Borowsky, 2001), we were able to estimate p from the data.

 

Technical control

            f is an experimentally determined estimate and should be corrected before use for any significant procedural estimation bias.  The most important potential source of bias would be variation in band repeatability.  To establish a baseline for the reliability of RAPD band amplification under our experimental conditions, we separately amplified replicates from the same DNA samples.  We used two different DNA sources from each of two species, eight replicates per source and one primer combination in this control series


Results

 

Control Series

The total number of bands that were amplified for all the DNA samples in the control series was 570.  Of these, 566 were completely consistent across replicates, while four were "sporadics," being present only about half the time ().  Thus, the strict repeatability of RAPD band amplification in the control series was 99.3%  Because the existence of a sporadic would contribute to f only when exhibited by one individual in a pair, the correction to f is approximately 2s(1-s) times 0.007.  This correction was applied to all estimates of f.  Its uniform application had no effect on statistical inferences, but did correct for a potential source of bias in estimates of p.

 

RAPD Band Variability

Figure 1 shows the results for populations of the three nemacheiline genera.  The three troglobitic populations have the lowest f values, with estimates ranging from 0.013 + 0.006 to 0.047 + 0.008.  Values of f for the epigean populations range from 0.074 + 0.012 to 0.187 + 0.025.

            Figure 2 shows the results for the balitorine genera.  The troglobitic species C. thamicola has a f value of 0.014 + 0.004.  Estimates for the epigean populations range in f values from 0.025 + 0.008 to 0.195 + 0.017.

            In spite of variability within the troglobitic and epigean groups, all four troglobites have lower mean f values than the comparison epigean species (ranges of 0.020 to 0.035 vs 0.041 to 0.189).  The mean value of f for the cave fishes (0.025 + 0.005 SE) is about 20% that of the epigean species (0.110 + 0.018) and significantly lower (t11 = 3.14, P < 0.01).

 

Replication and Repeatability

Five populations are represented by replicate estimates of f.  In four cases, the replicate estimates are almost identical.  Only in one case, the new cave species of Schistura from Phitsanulok, do the estimates differ to the extent that the error bars do not overlap.  Even in this case, the high estimate for the cave fish population is lower than any of the estimates of f for comparison epigean populations. 

            We studied two populations of S. poculi and five of Homaloptera smithi to test the repeatability of f among populations of the same species.  The two estimates for S. poculi were virtually identical (0.145 + 0.010 vs. 0.155 + 0.013) although the populations are 80 kilometers separate.  For H. smithi, f values fell into two significantly different, non-overlapping ranges:  high (0.181 to 0.197) for populations from the mainland and low (0.035 to 0.046) for populations from the Malaysian peninsula.  Estimates of f within each geographic area are virtually identical.  The differences among areas are so great as to suggest there are two distinct species, although this hypothesis waits testing.  For statistical analyses, we treated populations from these two areas as separate taxa: H. smithi from the mainland and H. aff. smithi from the peninsula.   Preliminary mtDNA sequence data (16SrRNA, 12SrRNA and cytochrome b) strongly support the specific distinction of the two forms (Borowsky, unpublished).

 


Nucleotide Diversity

Values of p were calculated from estimates of fe by the approximation: , where m is the number of bases per band screened in the process (Borowsky, 2001).  In this study, in which RAPD bands were amplified with pairs of primers (either 10 or 11 bp),  m averaged 20.8.  Calculated values of p for the troglobitic cave fishes were about 23% those of comparison surface fishes: averages of 3.9 * 10-3  vs. 0.9 * 10-3  (Figures 1 and 2). 


Discussion

 

Sampling the genome

The basic measure of variability we used, fe, is the empirically determined proportion of RAPD bands differing between two individuals drawn at random from a population.  The ten primer combinations employed in this study allowed us to score over 1000 RAPD loci in each population.  RAPD loci are generally unlinked or loosely linked with each other and sample variation throughout the genome.  With an average of 20.8 bases screened per primer combination, over 20,000 bases were assessed in each estimate of fe.  Thus, it is not surprising that the data show that replicate estimates of fe are consistent within populations and among populations of the same species.  This lends empirical support to Nei’s (1978) theoretical prediction that estimates of genetic variability derived from small numbers of individuals may be quite reliable, if a large number of gene loci are used.  Because RAPD is able to screen large numbers of loci with minimal effort, this approach may prove particularly efficient for comparative studies of genetic variation among large numbers of populations or species.

 

Nucleotide diversity in hypogean and epigean fishes

The limited data on allozyme variation cited in the introduction suggest that troglobitic fish populations have lower genetic variability than related surface populations.  The present results support this generalization with data at the level of DNA variation.  Each of the four balitorid cave fishes we tested fell significantly below the average genetic variability of an appropriate panel of related comparison epigean fishes.  The decreased genetic variation observed is consistent with the expectation that the troglobitic fishes have smaller population sizes than the epigean species.  Limited to single caves and cave systems, they certainly have smaller ranges.

            The foregoing does not preclude the possibility that hypogean fish species with large population sizes may eventually be found.  Should such be found, we predict they will have relatively high nucleotide diversities.

            Estimates of p in nuclear DNA can be obtained directly from sequence data, or indirectly from restriction fragment analysis or RAPD/AFLP data.   Sequence and restriction studies are generally focused on small portions of the genome, while RAPD/AFLP studies are genome-wide scans.  Because specific sites interesting or well enough known to warrant sequencing or restriction analysis often have significant functions, selection may limit their variability (Innan et al., 1999).  As expected, average estimates of p from sequencing and restriction are lower than those from RAPD and AFLP data [0.0038 + 0.0009 vs. 0.0135 + 0.0032 (S.E.);  Kreitman, 1991; Li and Sadler, 1991; Takano et al., 1991; Fullerton et al., 1994; Rogers and Kidd, 1996; Kawabe et al., 1997; Nickerson et al., 1998, vs. Harada et al., 1994; Martinez-Torres et al., 1997; Silveira et al., 1998; Innan et al., 1999; Verovnik et al., 1999].

            Our estimates of p for the epigean balitorids using RAPD data averaged lower (0.0039 + 0.005) than those in the RAPD/AFLP studies cited above, but are nearly identical to those obtained from sequence analysis.  Our estimates of p for the four cave balitorids (0.0009 + 0.0002) average significantly lower than those for epigean balitorids (t11 = 4.43, P < 0.05).

            The consistently large difference in variability between mainland and peninsular forms of "Homaloptera smithi" may simply reflect their suspected taxonomic distinction or, alternatively, be a function of habitat differences.  The peninsular populations are located in independent drainages feeding Phang Nga bay, which are much less extensive than the drainage systems of the mainland.  Larger drainage systems more likely support larger populations of freshwater fishes.

            The average value of p calculated for troglobites was 23% that of epigean populations.  Because p is a linear function of effective population size and mutation rate (Nei and Li, 1979), it is tempting to suggest that effective population sizes also differ by a factor of four to five-fold.  Troglobites are generally long lived, however, and it is not clear how this might affect their per generation mutation rates.  If these are significantly higher than those of their surface counterparts, the data could be consistent with an even greater disparity in effective population sizes between surface and cave fishes.  The use of nucleotide diversity data to reliably assess population sizes in troglobitic organisms will probably require a greater knowledge of their basic biology.

 

The reliability of RAPD

The RAPD technique is widely employed, but in practice bands are amplified and visualized by a variety of techniques.  Because the use of RAPDs for the estimation of nucleotide variability requires that results be repeatable, a brief comment on technical aspects is appropriate here.  The amplified band pattern consistency of 99.3% demonstrated in the present study is probably universally attainable if several precautions are taken.   Following Welsh and McClelland (1990) and others, and from our practical experience, we recommend: 1) all template concentrations must be uniform across samples.   Spectrophotometry and/or fluorimetry are inadequately reliable measures of high molecular weight DNA concentration.  The most consistent results are obtained if all template samples are titrated to concentration and measured against known quantitative DNA standards on agarose gels (Borowsky et al. 1995).  This is probably the most important step to insure consistent RAPD results, and is almost never employed.  2)  In our experience, the most robust and repeatable RAPD reactions come when two RAPD primers are used, instead of one (Welsh and McClelland, 1991).  The use of two different primers prevents self-annealing of the two ends of PCR product and provides more efficient template for the continuing reaction.  3)  Running products on thin, denaturing ("sequencing") PAGE gels and visualizing them using 33P or 32P provides a sensitive and quantitative measure of band presence.  In our experience, silver staining is not quantitative and is unacceptably variable among gels (although we recognize that other laboratories may be able to produce more consistent results with silver staining), and ethidium staining of agarose gels is insufficiently sensitive.  We find the use of 33P particularly convenient because of its relatively long half-life and low emission energy, and it avoids the need of toxic reagents, like ethidium bromide and silver salts.

            Thus, using RAPDs and a new analytic model it is possible to reliably assess nucleotide diversity in populations using DNA samples from as few as two individuals.  This approach should prove useful in the study of populations that are endangered or relatively inaccessible, and in large scale comparisons of many species.


Acknowledgments

            This work was supported by grants to RB from the National Science Foundation (INT9605200), the H. R. Axelrod Foundation and The Research Challenge Fund (NYU).  The Royal Thai Forestry and Fisheries Departments provided material support in the field.  Identifications of some specimens were verified by Maurice Kottelat, Cornol, Switzerland.  Technical work by Juliya Starobinets is gratefully acknowledged.  Rob Desalle provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.


References

            Avise JC, Selander RK  (1972)  Evolutionary genetics of cave-dwelling fishes of the genus Astyanax. Evolution 26, 1-19.

            Borowsky R  (2001)  Estimating Nucleotide Diversity From Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Data.  Mol. Phylogenet. and Evol. 18, 143-148.

            Borowsky R, McClelland M, Cheng R, Welsh J (1995)  Arbitrarily primed DNA fingerprinting for phylogenetic reconstruction in vertebrates.  Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 1022‑1032.

Fullerton SM, Harding RM, Boyce AJ, Clegg JB  (1994)  Molecular and population genetic analysis of allelic sequence diversity at the human beta-globin locus.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA). 91, 1805-1809.

Harada K, Kinoshita A, Shukor NAA, Tachida H, Yamazaki T  (1994)  Genetic variation estimated in three Shorea species by RAPD analysis.  Jpn. J. Genet. 69, 713-718.

Innan H, Terauchi R, Kahl G, Tajima F  (1999)   A method for estimating nucleotide diversity from AFLP data.  Genetics 151, 1157-1164.

            Kawabe A, Innan H, Terauchi R, Miyashita NT  (1997)   Nucleotide polymorphism in the acidic chitinase locus (ChiA) region of the wild plant Arabidopsis thaliana.  Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1303-1315.

            Kottelat, M  (1989)  Zoogeography of the fishes from the Indochinese inland waters with an annotated check-list.  Bull. Zöol. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam.  12, 1-54.

            Kottelat, M  (1990)  Indochinese nemacheilines.  A revision of the nemacheiline loaches (Pisces: Cypriniformes) of Thailand, Burma, Laos, Cambodia and southern Viet Nam.  Verlag Dr. F Pfeil, Munchen, 262 pp., 180 figs.

            Kottelat, M  (1998)  Homaloptera yuwonoi, a new species of hillstream loach from Borneo, with a new generic name for H. thamicola (Teleostei: Balitoridae).  Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters 9, 267-272.

Kreitman, M  (1991)   Detecting selection at the level of DNA.  Chapter 10 in:  Evolution at the Molecular Level (eds. Selander RK, Clark AG, Whittam TS), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

Li W-H, Sadler LA  (1991) Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics 129, 513-524.

Martinez-Torres D, Carrio R, Latorre A, Simon JC, Hermoso A, Moya A  (1997) Assessing the nucleotide diversity of three aphid species by RAPD.  J. Evol. Biol. 10, 459-477.

Matsuda M, Yonekawa H, Hamaguchi S, Sakaizumi M  (1997) Geographic variation and diversity in the mitochondrial DNA of the medaka, Oryzias latipes, as determined by restriction endonuclease analysis.  Zoological Science (Tokyo). 14, 517-526.

            Mitchell RW, Russell WH, Elliott WR  (1977)  Mexican eyeless characin fishes, genus Astyanax:  Environment, distribution and evolution.  Special Publ. Mus. Texas Tech. Univ.  12, 1-89, 21 Figs.

Nickerson DA, Taylor SL, Weiss KM, et al.  (1998)  DNA sequence diversity in a 9.7-kb region of the human lipoprotein lipase gene.  Nature Genetics. 19, 233-240.

            Nei M  (1978)  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.  Genetics 89, 583-590.

            Nei M,  Li W-H  (1979  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 76, 5269-5273.

            Perez JE, GE Moodie  (1993)  Genetic variation in a cave-dwelling Venezuelan catfish.  Zoologia (Acta Cientifica Venezolana) 44, 28-31.

            Poulson TL  (1963)  Cave adaptation in Amblyopsid fishes. Amer. Midl. Nat. 70, 257-290.

            Proudlove, GS  (1997)  The conservation status of hypogean fishes. pp. 355-358 In: Proc. 12th Int. Cong. Speleol., La Chaux de Fonds, Switzerland, August (1997.

Rogers J,  Kidd K  (1996)  Nucleotide polymorphism, effective population size, and dispersal distances in the yellow baboons (Papio hamadryas cynocephalus) of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania).  Amer. J. Primatol. 38, 157-168.

Silveira EB, Al-Janabi SM, Magalhaes BP, Carvalho LJ, Tigano MS  (1998)  Polymorphism of the grasshopper Schistocerca pallens (Thunberg) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and its natural pathogen Metarhizium flavoviride (Gams and Rozsypal) (Hyphomycetes), revealed by RAPD analysis. Anais Da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil. 27, 91-99.

            Swofford DL, Branson BA, Sievert G  (1980)  Genetic differentiation of cavefish populations (Amblyopsidae). Isozyme Bull 13, 109-110.

Takano TS, Kusakabe S, Mukai T  (1991)  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster XXII.  Comparative study of DNA polymorphism in northern and southern natural populations.  Genetics 129, 753-761.

            Trajano E  (1997)  Population ecology of Trichomycterus itacarambiensis, a cave catfish from Eastern Brazil (Siluriformes, Trichomycteridae).  Env. Biol. of Fishes 50, 357-369.

            Verovnik R, Trontelj P, Sket B  (1999)  Genetic differentiation and species status within the snail leech Glossiphonia complanata aggregate (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae) revealed by RAPD analysis.  Archiv Fuer Hydrobiologie. 144, 327-338.

            Weber A, Proudlove GS, Parzefall J, Wilkens H, Nalband TT  (1998)  Pisces (Teleostei).  Pp. 1179-1190 in: Juberthie C, Decu V (eds.), Encyclopaedia Biospeologica, Tome II. Société de Biospéologie, Moulis, France 1373 pp.

            Welsh J, McClelland  M  (1990)  Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers.  Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 7213-7218.

            Welsh J, McClelland  M  (1991)  Genomic fingerprinting with AP-PCR using pairwise combinations of primers: application to generic mapping of the mouse.  Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5275-5279.

Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV  (1990)  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers.  Nucleic Acids Res.  18,  6531-6535.


Author Information

            This work is part of a larger comparative study of troglobitic and regressive evolution in  cave fishes (www.homepages.nyu.edu/~rb4).  Richard Borowsky is an evolutionist specializing in the population genetics and microevolution of tropical freshwater fishes, both epigean and troglobitic.  Chavalit Vidthayanon is an ichthyologist specializing in the fishes of Southeast Asia. 


Figure Legends

Figure 1:  Fig1Nema.PDF Variability in populations of nemacheiline hillstream loaches; Phenotypic Heterogeneity Index, f; Nucleotide Diversity, p.  Epigean populations are as follows: 1 -- Acanthocobitis zonalternans (Huai Mae La Mao, 27 km e. of Mae Sot, Tak Prov., Salween dr.). 2 -- Schistura paucicinta (Huay Kitue, 10 km nw of Mae Ramat, Tak Prov., Salween); 3 -- S. poculi population a = Nam Khong river, Nam Khong, MHS, Salween; 4 -- S. poculi population b = Huay Mae Yuam Luang, Kham Suk, Mae Hong Son Prov, Salween; 5 -- S. maepaiensis (Pai river, 9 km se Pai, MHS, Salween), 6 -- Schistura reidi (same locality as #2), 7 -- Nemacheilus pallidus (Stream 5 km n of Thung Pha Phum, Kanchanaburi Prov. = KN, Mae Khlong dr.).  Cave populations are as follows: 8 -- New Cave Fish species, Schistura aff. reidi (Tham Phra Wang Daeng, 50 km ese of Phitsanulok, Phitsanulok Prov., Chao Phrya dr.). 9 -- Schistura oedipus (Tham Ban Pak Kut, 9 km wnw of Soppong, MHS, Salween), 10 -- N. troglocataractus (Tham Wang Ba Dang, Sai Yok Noi NP, KN, Mae Khlong dr.).

Figure 2: Fig2Bali.PDF Variability in populations of balitorine hillstream loaches; Phenotypic Heterogeneity Index, f; Nucleotide Diversity, p.  Epigean populations are as follows: Homaloptera smithi from two mainland areas (11 -- same as #8; 12 -- same as #7) and from three populations northeast of Phang Nga on the Malaysian peninsula in small independent tributaries of Phang Nga Bay (13 -- Tham Phet, 1 km n of Ban Nok, Phang Nga Prov. = PN; 14 -- Tham Nam I, 2 km ne Ban Nok, PN.; 15 -- Stream 7 km sw Thap Put, PN); 16 -- Balitora burmanica (Mae Sanghi stream, 17 km n of Mae Hong Son, MHS, Salween dr.):  The cave population (17) is of Cryptotora thamicola (Tham Susa, 7 km s of Nam Khong, MHS, Salween dr.).
Table 1.  Genetic variation of enzyme coding loci in cave fish species and related surface taxa.  Genetic variation is expressed as heterozygosity (H), as reported in or calculated from data in the cited studies.  Cited studies: 1) Swofford, Branson and Sievert, 1980. 2) Avise and Selander, 1972.  3) Perez and Moodie, 1993.

 

Fish Family                   Scope of Study             Heterozygosity

  Habit                                                                          (mean or range)

Amblyopsidae1 5 species, 19-22 loci               

  troglobites                  3 species, 18 pops.                   0.000 - 0.019

  troglophile                  1 species, 10 pops.                   0.0280

  epigean                       1 species, 11 pops.                   0.0400

Characidae2                  1 species, 17 loci                                 

  troglobites                  2 caves, 91 inds.                       0.000 - 0.033

  hybrid swarm  1 cave, 45 inds.                        0.096

  epigean                       6 pops., 257 inds.                     0.081 - 0.139

Trichomycteridae3         1 species, 40 loci

  troglobite                    1 pop., 30 inds.                        0.000

  epigean                       1 pop., 80 inds.                        0.025