In the previous section, the concept of an ensemble was introduced, and the specific
example of the microcanonical ensemble, as the ensemble of systems having
was discussed. In general, an ensemble is defined by its phase space distribution
function
, which may possibly depend explicitly on time.
The phase space distribution function must satisfy the Liouville equation, which
for systems governed by Hamiltonian dynamics is
where
is the 2dN-dimensional gradient on the phase space.
The Liouville equation results from the requirement that the rate of
change of the number of ensemble members in an arbitrary phase space volume
is equal to the flux of members through the boundary of the volume.
It can be seen that the Liouville equation is a
statement of the conservation of f. Since f is
a probability distribution function, the existence of a conservation law for f implies
the existence of a conserved phase space measure,
For Hamiltonian systems the invariant measure is,
. It will shortly be shown below why this is an
invariant measure
for Hamiltonian systems. In summary, given an ensemble distribution function
satisfying
Eq. (4.1), the average of any observable
can be defined by
Non-Hamiltonian equations of motion are typically used to generate ensembles other than the microcanonical, for describing systems subject to non-holonomic constraints, or for describing driven systems. The idea of generating ensembles dynamically began with the work of Andersen [24], who showed that by extending the phase space beyond the 2dN dimensions of the physical system, a dynamical scheme could be constructed to generate an isobaric distribution of the physical subsystem. Isothermal extensions followed [25, 26]. These original formulations of extended phase space dynamics were based on Hamiltonian systems, which possess certain undersirable features related to the definition of time. It was shown that these could be corrected by going over to a non-Hamiltonian formulation [27]. However, only recently has a consistent theoretical statistical framework underlying the use of general non-Hamiltonian systems been presented [20]. The theoretical underpinnings will be discussed below.
Consider the dynamical system,
which is assumed to be non-Hamiltonian (i.e., expressible in the form of
Eqs. (3.4)). Here,
is a generalized force, which may
have an explicit time dependence. If
the dynamical system is not Hamiltonian, then its phase space compressibility,
defined to be
which vanishes for a Hamiltonian system (the incompressibility property),
will generally be nonzero and the phase space measure
is no longer
invariant. In order to see this, one need only consider the Jacobian of the
transformation
from an initial phase space vector
a time-evolved vector
given by
where n is the dimension of the phase space.
It can be shown (see, e.g. Ref. [20])
that
satisfies the following
evolution equation:
with initial condition
. Equation (4.6)
implies that J will only be 1 for all time if
as it is for Hamiltonian
systems. For non-Hamiltonian systems, the measure transforms according to
which demonstrates that if
,
.
A complete statistical theory of non-Hamiltonian systems has recently been presented in [20]. The basic tenets of the theory are:
where the metric factor
is given by
and the function
is related to the compressibility
by
and the corresponding partition function is